On 2020-06-29 at 12:13 CEST, Claudio Fontana wrote...
> Hello Christophe,
>
> On 6/26/20 6:42 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> In order to facilitate the move of large chunks of functionality to
>> load modules, it is simpler to create a wrapper with the same name
>> that simply relays the im
On 2020-06-30 at 11:38 CEST, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote...
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:42:58PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> In order to facilitate the move of large chunks of functionality to
>> load modules, it is simpler to create a wrapper with the same name
>> that simply relays the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:42:58PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> In order to facilitate the move of large chunks of functionality to
> load modules, it is simpler to create a wrapper with the same name
> that simply relays the implementation. For efficiency, this is
> typically done using
Hello Christophe,
On 6/26/20 6:42 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> In order to facilitate the move of large chunks of functionality to
> load modules, it is simpler to create a wrapper with the same name
> that simply relays the implementation. For efficiency, this is
> typically done using inl
In order to facilitate the move of large chunks of functionality to
load modules, it is simpler to create a wrapper with the same name
that simply relays the implementation. For efficiency, this is
typically done using inline functions in the header for the
corresponding functionality. In that case
