Re: NetBSD/arc on MIPS Magnum, was Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2020-01-06 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, hpous...@reactos.org wrote: > > > > I haven't tried the latest iso (9.0-rc1). > > I found that NetBSD 9.0-rc1 has the same regressions. > > Hello Finn, > > Thanks for finding the required steps to boot NetBSD on MIPS Magnum. I > was trying to find how to let it work on

Re: NetBSD/arc on MIPS Magnum, was Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-23 Thread Hervé Poussineau
Le 24/12/2019 à 05:33, Finn Thain a écrit : On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote: I know precious little about NetBSD installation and MIPS Magnum. What I wrote above was guesswork. Hence this could be a NetBSD bug or user error. It was bugs and user error. The user error was not using th

Re: NetBSD/arc on MIPS Magnum, was Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-23 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote: > > I know precious little about NetBSD installation and MIPS Magnum. What I > wrote above was guesswork. Hence this could be a NetBSD bug or user > error. > It was bugs and user error. The user error was not using the serial console. The NetBSD/arc in

NetBSD/arc on MIPS Magnum, was Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-23 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daud? wrote: > Hi Finn, > > On 12/20/19 5:24 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Dec 2019, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > > > > > > > > Herve, > > > > > > Is there any way for us to come up with an equivalent or at least > > > approximate scenario for Jazz

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-23 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi Finn, On 12/20/19 5:24 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Sun, 15 Dec 2019, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: Herve, Is there any way for us to come up with an equivalent or at least approximate scenario for Jazz machines? Regards, Aleksandar That would be useful in general, but in this case I think i

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-21 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
On Saturday, December 21, 2019, Finn Thain wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > Le 20/12/2019 ? 12:38, Aleksandar Markovic a ?crit?: > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:29 AM Finn Thain > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-20 Thread Finn Thain
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 20/12/2019 ? 12:38, Aleksandar Markovic a ?crit?: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:29 AM Finn Thain > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. > >> > >> Whilst debugging that issue I

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-20 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 20/12/2019 à 12:38, Aleksandar Markovic a écrit : > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:29 AM Finn Thain wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. >> >> Whilst debugging that issue I found that the receiver algorithm differs >> from the one describ

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-20 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:38 PM Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:29 AM Finn Thain wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. > > > > Whilst debugging that issue I found that the receiver algorithm differs > > fro

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-20 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:29 AM Finn Thain wrote: > > Hi All, > > There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. > > Whilst debugging that issue I found that the receiver algorithm differs > from the one described in the National Semiconductor datasheet. > Finn, could you

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > > Herve, > > Is there any way for us to come up with an equivalent or at least > approximate scenario for Jazz machines? > > Regards, > Aleksandar > That would be useful in general, but in this case I think it might be better to test NetBSD,

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote: > 00:15:29.341601 IP truncated-ip - 52 bytes missing! 192.168.66.1 > > 192.168.66.111: ICMP echo request, id 23957, seq 12, length 64 ... > > Sniffing br0 on the host shows no sign of the truncated packet at all > which leaves a gap in the packet sequenc

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-15 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote: > I test the qemu build like this, > > qemu-system-m68k -M q800 -m 512M -serial none -serial mon:stdio -g 800x600x4 > -net nic,model=dp83932,addr=00:00:00:01:02:03 > -net bridge,helper=/opt/qemu/libexec/qemu-bridge-helper,br=br0 > -append "fbcon=font:ProFont

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-14 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
On Sunday, December 15, 2019, Aleksandar Markovic < aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 15, 2019, Finn Thain > wrote: > >> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: >> >> > On Saturday, December 14, 2019, Finn Thain >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > Th

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-14 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
On Sunday, December 15, 2019, Finn Thain wrote: > On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > > > On Saturday, December 14, 2019, Finn Thain > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. > > > > > > > > Can you provide the

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-14 Thread Finn Thain
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > On Saturday, December 14, 2019, Finn Thain > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. > > > > > Can you provide the details of your test scenario? > > Thanks, > Aleksandar > I test th

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-14 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/14/19 7:38 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: On 12/14/19 3:52 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: === OUTPUT BEGIN === 1/10 Checking commit 9c9ffc38e9b9 (dp8393x: Mask EOL bit from descriptor addresses) ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-14 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
On Saturday, December 14, 2019, Finn Thain wrote: > Hi All, > > There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. > > Can you provide the details of your test scenario? Thanks, Aleksandar > Whilst debugging that issue I found that the receiver algorithm differs > from t

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-14 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 12/14/19 3:52 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: === OUTPUT BEGIN === 1/10 Checking commit 9c9ffc38e9b9 (dp8393x: Mask EOL bit from descriptor addresses) ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required #24: FILE: hw/net/dp8393x.c:200: +r

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-13 Thread Finn Thain
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > === OUTPUT BEGIN === > 1/10 Checking commit 9c9ffc38e9b9 (dp8393x: Mask EOL bit from descriptor > addresses) > ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required > #24: FILE: hw/net/dp8393x.c:200: > +return (s->regs[SONIC_URDA] <<

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-13 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/cover.1576286757.git.fth...@telegraphics.com.au/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation Type: series Message-id: cover.1576286757

[PATCH 00/10] Fixes for DP8393X SONIC device emulation

2019-12-13 Thread Finn Thain
Hi All, There is a bug in the DP8393X emulation that can stop packet reception. Whilst debugging that issue I found that the receiver algorithm differs from the one described in the National Semiconductor datasheet. These issues and others are addressed by this patch series. This series has onl