Re: [PATCH 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-28 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:56:58 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote: here should be a brief introduction to series [and changelog if it's not the first revision] > Brice Goglin (4): >hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa >tests: acpi: add and whitelist *.hmat-noinitiator expected blobs >

Re: [PATCH 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-24 Thread Jonathan Cameron via
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:56:58 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote: > Brice Goglin (4): >hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa >tests: acpi: add and whitelist *.hmat-noinitiator expected blobs >tests: acpi: q35: add test for hmat nodes without initiators >tests: acpi: q35: update e

[PATCH 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

2022-06-23 Thread Brice Goglin
Brice Goglin (4): hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa tests: acpi: add and whitelist *.hmat-noinitiator expected blobs tests: acpi: q35: add test for hmat nodes without initiators tests: acpi: q35: update expected blobs *.hmat-noinitiators hw/core/machine.c