Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make it possible to compile with CONFIG_ARM_V7M=n

2019-09-23 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 9/23/19 10:50 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 23/09/2019 10.37, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> On 9/21/19 5:04 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> We've got CONFIG_ARM_V7M, but it currently can't be disabled. >>> Here are some patches that should allow to disable the switch >>> (if the cor

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make it possible to compile with CONFIG_ARM_V7M=n

2019-09-23 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi Thomas, On 9/21/19 5:04 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > We've got CONFIG_ARM_V7M, but it currently can't be disabled. > Here are some patches that should allow to disable the switch > (if the corresponding boards are disabled, too). What about the ARMv4/v5/v6/v7r?

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make it possible to compile with CONFIG_ARM_V7M=n

2019-09-23 Thread Thomas Huth
On 23/09/2019 10.37, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On 9/21/19 5:04 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> We've got CONFIG_ARM_V7M, but it currently can't be disabled. >> Here are some patches that should allow to disable the switch >> (if the corresponding boards are disabled, too). > > What

[PATCH 0/4] Make it possible to compile with CONFIG_ARM_V7M=n

2019-09-21 Thread Thomas Huth
We've got CONFIG_ARM_V7M, but it currently can't be disabled. Here are some patches that should allow to disable the switch (if the corresponding boards are disabled, too). RFC -> v1: - Move the definitions into internals.h instead of cpu.h in the 1st patch - Instead of creating an ugly stubs fi