Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/i386: Fix 0 * Inf + QNaN regression

2025-02-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 2/3/25 12:05, Peter Maydell wrote: On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 17:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Queued, thanks. Thanks; do you plan to send a pullreq with these in soon? I ask because the Arm FEAT_AFP set is now ready to land and it has a dependency on these. I do but if you want to send it yourse

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/i386: Fix 0 * Inf + QNaN regression

2025-02-03 Thread Peter Maydell
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 17:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Queued, thanks. Thanks; do you plan to send a pullreq with these in soon? I ask because the Arm FEAT_AFP set is now ready to land and it has a dependency on these. thanks -- PMM

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/i386: Fix 0 * Inf + QNaN regression

2025-01-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Queued, thanks. Paolo

[PATCH 0/2] target/i386: Fix 0 * Inf + QNaN regression

2025-01-16 Thread Peter Maydell
This patchset fixes a regression that I introduced in my recent refactoring of softfloat NaN handling, in commit 8adcff4ae7 ("fpu: handle raising Invalid for infzero in pick_nan_muladd"). When I wrote that code I was under the impression that all architectures would raise Invalid for the "inf * zer