Keith Packard writes:
> Alex Bennée writes:
>
>> Note: we aren't currently testing riscv32 due to missing toolchain for
>> check-tcg tests.
>
> That's surprising -- the usual risc-v toolchain supports both 64- and
> 32- bit targets.
If you can give me the runes for it I can tweak check-tcg to
Alex Bennée writes:
> Note: we aren't currently testing riscv32 due to missing toolchain for
> check-tcg tests.
That's surprising -- the usual risc-v toolchain supports both 64- and
32- bit targets.
Othewise, this patch is
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PG
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 14:24, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> From the semihosting point of view what we want to know is the current
> mode of the processor. Unify this into a single helper and allow us to
> use the same GET/SET_ARG helpers for the rest of the code.
>
> Note: we aren't currently testing ris
>From the semihosting point of view what we want to know is the current
mode of the processor. Unify this into a single helper and allow us to
use the same GET/SET_ARG helpers for the rest of the code.
Note: we aren't currently testing riscv32 due to missing toolchain for
check-tcg tests.
Signed-
