Corey Minyard writes:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:36:53PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> This test has been unstable on NetBSD for awhile. It seems the
>> mechanism used to listen to a random port is a Linux-ism (although a
>> received wisdom Linux-ism rather than a well documented one). As
>
>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:36:53PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> This test has been unstable on NetBSD for awhile. It seems the
> mechanism used to listen to a random port is a Linux-ism (although a
> received wisdom Linux-ism rather than a well documented one). As
Hmm. I got reports of this issue
This test has been unstable on NetBSD for awhile. It seems the
mechanism used to listen to a random port is a Linux-ism (although a
received wisdom Linux-ism rather than a well documented one). As
working around would add more hard to test complexity to the test I've
gone for the easier option of m
