On 2021/11/15 18:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 11/12/21 03:28, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
On 2021/11/11 18:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
If the MachineClass::name pointer is not explicitly set, it is NULL.
Per the C standard, passing a NULL pointer to printf "%s" format is
undefined. Som
On 11/12/21 03:28, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
> On 2021/11/11 18:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> If the MachineClass::name pointer is not explicitly set, it is NULL.
>> Per the C standard, passing a NULL pointer to printf "%s" format is
>> undefined. Some implementations display it as 'NULL', other
On 2021/11/11 18:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
If the MachineClass::name pointer is not explicitly set, it is NULL.
Per the C standard, passing a NULL pointer to printf "%s" format is
undefined. Some implementations display it as 'NULL', other as 'null'.
Since we are comparing the formatted
On 11/11/21 11:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
If the MachineClass::name pointer is not explicitly set, it is NULL.
Per the C standard, passing a NULL pointer to printf "%s" format is
undefined. Some implementations display it as 'NULL', other as 'null'.
Since we are comparing the formatted
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:03:48AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> If the MachineClass::name pointer is not explicitly set, it is NULL.
> Per the C standard, passing a NULL pointer to printf "%s" format is
> undefined. Some implementations display it as 'NULL', other as 'null'.
> Since we ar
If the MachineClass::name pointer is not explicitly set, it is NULL.
Per the C standard, passing a NULL pointer to printf "%s" format is
undefined. Some implementations display it as 'NULL', other as 'null'.
Since we are comparing the formatted output, we need a stable value.
The easiest is to expl
