On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:37 PM Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote:
>
> On 2/12/2025 09:06, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> >> -i = cpu_to_le16(svq->desc_next[i]);
> >> +i = le16_to_cpu(svq->desc_next[i]);
> >
> > Both svq->desc_next and "i" are in QEMU. We can skip the conversion
> > and ass
On 2/12/2025 09:06, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
-i = cpu_to_le16(svq->desc_next[i]);
+i = le16_to_cpu(svq->desc_next[i]);
Both svq->desc_next and "i" are in QEMU. We can skip the conversion
and assign directly.
Are you saying that desc_next[] should be in "CPU" and not LE form
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 5:20 PM Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote:
>
> VDPA didn't work on a big-endian machine due to missing/incorrect
> CPU<->LE data format conversions.
>
Thank you very much for this!
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 16 +---
VDPA didn't work on a big-endian machine due to missing/incorrect
CPU<->LE data format conversions.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy
---
hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
b
