Re: [PATCH] tests/unit/test-image-locking: Fix handling of temporary files

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:59 PM Thomas Huth wrote: > > test-image-locking leaves some temporary files around - clean > them up. While we're at it, test-image-locking is a unit test, > so it should not use "qtest.*" for temporary file names. Give > them better names instead, so that it clear where

Re: [PATCH] tests/unit/test-image-locking: Fix handling of temporary files

On 12/10/2022 11.21, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:03 PM Thomas Huth > wrote: test-image-locking leaves some temporary files around - clean them up. While we're at it, test-image-locking is a unit test, so it should not use "qtest.*"

Re: [PATCH] tests/unit/test-image-locking: Fix handling of temporary files

Hi On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:03 PM Thomas Huth wrote: > test-image-locking leaves some temporary files around - clean > them up. While we're at it, test-image-locking is a unit test, > so it should not use "qtest.*" for temporary file names. Give > them better names instead, so that it clear whe

[PATCH] tests/unit/test-image-locking: Fix handling of temporary files

test-image-locking leaves some temporary files around - clean them up. While we're at it, test-image-locking is a unit test, so it should not use "qtest.*" for temporary file names. Give them better names instead, so that it clear where the temporary files come from. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --