On 17/10/24 06:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
32-bit TSTEQ and TSTNE is subject to the same constraints as
for 64-bit, but setcond_i32 and negsetcond_i32 were incorrectly
using TCG_CT_CONST ("i") instead of TCG_CT_CONST_CMP ("C").
Adjust the constraint and make tcg_target_const_match use the
same sequ
On 10/17/24 02:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
32-bit TSTEQ and TSTNE is subject to the same constraints as
for 64-bit, but setcond_i32 and negsetcond_i32 were incorrectly
using TCG_CT_CONST ("i") instead of TCG_CT_CONST_CMP ("C").
Adjust the constraint and make tcg_target_const_match use the
same sequ
On 10/17/24 12:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 10:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
32-bit TSTEQ and TSTNE is subject to the same constraints as
for 64-bit, but setcond_i32 and negsetcond_i32 were incorrectly
using TCG_CT_CONST ("i") instead of TCG_CT_CONST_CMP ("C").
Adjust the constr
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 10:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> 32-bit TSTEQ and TSTNE is subject to the same constraints as
> for 64-bit, but setcond_i32 and negsetcond_i32 were incorrectly
> using TCG_CT_CONST ("i") instead of TCG_CT_CONST_CMP ("C").
>
> Adjust the constraint and make tcg_target_const_ma
32-bit TSTEQ and TSTNE is subject to the same constraints as
for 64-bit, but setcond_i32 and negsetcond_i32 were incorrectly
using TCG_CT_CONST ("i") instead of TCG_CT_CONST_CMP ("C").
Adjust the constraint and make tcg_target_const_match use the
same sequence as tgen_cmp2: first check if the cons
