On 9/8/22 18:44, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 9/8/22 22:18, Leandro Lupori wrote:
PowerPC64 processors handle direct branches better than indirect
ones, resulting in less stalled cycles and branch misses.
However, PPC's tb_target_set_jmp_target() was only using direct
branches for 16-bit jumps,
On 9/8/22 22:18, Leandro Lupori wrote:
PowerPC64 processors handle direct branches better than indirect
ones, resulting in less stalled cycles and branch misses.
However, PPC's tb_target_set_jmp_target() was only using direct
branches for 16-bit jumps, while PowerPC64's unconditional branch
inst
PowerPC64 processors handle direct branches better than indirect
ones, resulting in less stalled cycles and branch misses.
However, PPC's tb_target_set_jmp_target() was only using direct
branches for 16-bit jumps, while PowerPC64's unconditional branch
instructions are able to handle displacements
