Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check

Hi Fabiano, On 9/10/24 04:36, Fabiano Rosas wrote: Nicholas Piggin writes: The move to decodetree flipped the inequality test for the VEC / VSX MSR facility check. This caused application crashes under Linux, where these facility unavailable interrupts are used for lazy-switching of VEC/VSX

Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check

Nicholas Piggin writes: > The move to decodetree flipped the inequality test for the VEC / VSX > MSR facility check. > > This caused application crashes under Linux, where these facility > unavailable interrupts are used for lazy-switching of VEC/VSX register > sets. Getting the incorrect interru

Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check

On 2/13/24 09:39, Nicholas Piggin wrote: The move to decodetree flipped the inequality test for the VEC / VSX MSR facility check. This caused application crashes under Linux, where these facility unavailable interrupts are used for lazy-switching of VEC/VSX register sets. Getting the incorrect i

Re: [PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check

On 2/13/24 14:09, Nicholas Piggin wrote: The move to decodetree flipped the inequality test for the VEC / VSX MSR facility check. This caused application crashes under Linux, where these facility unavailable interrupts are used for lazy-switching of VEC/VSX register sets. Getting the incorrec

[PATCH] target/ppc: Fix lxv/stxv MSR facility check

The move to decodetree flipped the inequality test for the VEC / VSX MSR facility check. This caused application crashes under Linux, where these facility unavailable interrupts are used for lazy-switching of VEC/VSX register sets. Getting the incorrect interrupt would result in wrong registers be