On Tue, 5 May 2020 08:41:59 -0400
Janosch Frank wrote:
> s390_pv_perf_clear_reset() is not a very helpful name since that
> function needs to be called for a normal and a clear reset via
> diag308.
>
> Let's instead name it s390_pv_prep_reset() which reflects the purpose
> of the function a bit
On 05.05.20 14:41, Janosch Frank wrote:
> s390_pv_perf_clear_reset() is not a very helpful name since that
> function needs to be called for a normal and a clear reset via
> diag308.
>
> Let's instead name it s390_pv_prep_reset() which reflects the purpose
> of the function a bit better.
>
> Sign
s390_pv_perf_clear_reset() is not a very helpful name since that
function needs to be called for a normal and a clear reset via
diag308.
Let's instead name it s390_pv_prep_reset() which reflects the purpose
of the function a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
---
hw/s390x/pv.c
