On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 01:47:07PM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> the code in pcibus_get_fw_dev_path contained the potential for a
> stack buffer overflow of 1 byte, potentially writing to the stack an
> extra NUL byte.
>
> This overflow could happen if the PCI slot is >= 0x1000,
> and the PC
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 6:15 PM Claudio Fontana wrote:
>
> On 5/31/22 14:26, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 5:20 PM Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >>
> >> the code in pcibus_get_fw_dev_path contained the potential for a
> >> stack buffer overflow of 1 byte, potentially writing to the stac
On 5/31/22 14:26, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 5:20 PM Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>
>> the code in pcibus_get_fw_dev_path contained the potential for a
>> stack buffer overflow of 1 byte, potentially writing to the stack an
>> extra NUL byte.
>>
>> This overflow could happen if the PCI
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 5:20 PM Claudio Fontana wrote:
>
> the code in pcibus_get_fw_dev_path contained the potential for a
> stack buffer overflow of 1 byte, potentially writing to the stack an
> extra NUL byte.
>
> This overflow could happen if the PCI slot is >= 0x1000,
> and the PCI functi
the code in pcibus_get_fw_dev_path contained the potential for a
stack buffer overflow of 1 byte, potentially writing to the stack an
extra NUL byte.
This overflow could happen if the PCI slot is >= 0x1000,
and the PCI function is >= 0x1000, due to the size parameter
of snprintf being inco