Re: [PATCH] migration: Count new_dirty instead of real_dirty

2020-06-15 Thread zhukeqian
uan Quintela ; Chao Fan ; >> Wanghaibin (D) >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Count new_dirty instead of real_dirty >> >> Hi Paolo and Jian Zhou, >> >> Do you have any suggestion on this patch? >> >> Thanks, >> Keqian >> >> On 202

RE: [PATCH] migration: Count new_dirty instead of real_dirty

2020-06-15 Thread Zhoujian (jay)
Hi Keqian, > -Original Message- > From: zhukeqian > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 11:19 AM > To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org; Paolo Bonzini > ; Zhoujian (jay) > Cc: Juan Quintela ; Chao Fan ; > Wanghaibin (D) > Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Co

Re: [PATCH] migration: Count new_dirty instead of real_dirty

2020-06-14 Thread zhukeqian
Hi Paolo and Jian Zhou, Do you have any suggestion on this patch? Thanks, Keqian On 2020/6/1 12:02, Keqian Zhu wrote: > DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_ALL_SET feature is on the queue. This fixs the > dirty rate calculation for this feature. After introducing this > feature, real_dirty_pages is equal to tot

[PATCH] migration: Count new_dirty instead of real_dirty

2020-05-31 Thread Keqian Zhu
DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_ALL_SET feature is on the queue. This fixs the dirty rate calculation for this feature. After introducing this feature, real_dirty_pages is equal to total memory size at begining. This causing wrong dirty rate and false positive throttling. BTW, real dirty rate is not suitable