On 5/23/23 01:18, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:02:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
I'm curious why we need to do anything ? I would have thought that meson
should handle 'b_pie' itself, passing the right args t
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:18 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The issue is that Meson only has "enable PIE" or "leave PIE to the
> > compiler default", while QEMU also has "disable PIE"---which is the
> > messy one.
>
> Does QEMU actually need "disable PIE" ? It existed in configure of
> course,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:02:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> > I'm curious why we need to do anything ? I would have thought that meson
> > should handle 'b_pie' itself, passing the right args to $CC that it feels
> > are appropr
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> I'm curious why we need to do anything ? I would have thought that meson
> should handle 'b_pie' itself, passing the right args to $CC that it feels
> are appropriate. I don't recall seeing other apps using meson trying to
> handle b_pi
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:08:16AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
> this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
> ("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
>
> Resolves
22.05.2023 18:54, Richard Henderson wrote:
..
-no-pie is a linker flag, but distro folk that didn't quite know what they were doing made local changes to gcc's specs file. So it *is* a compiler
command-line flag, but only for some builds of gcc.
Which distros is that? Debian?
Patching gcc spec
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:39 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
> > + # What about linker flags? For a static build, no PIE is implied by
> > -static
> > + # which we added above.
>
> Is it though? That was the major problem at the time: it wasn't.
It's what configure was doing:
if test "$static"
Am 22.05.23 um 10:08 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-p
On 5/22/23 01:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
It's not nearly as simple as that.
+
On 5/22/23 01:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-projec
On 22/5/23 10:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-projec
The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1664
Signed-off-by: Paolo
12 matches
Mail list logo
