On 25/02/20 21:46, Matt Borgerson wrote:
> [ ping ]
>
> Hi Paolo, would you mind taking a quick look at this patch for
> memory.c to consider
> it for merge? This resolves an issue with dirty bits not being cleared
> as expected.
>
> Here's the Patchwork link: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12
[ ping ]
Hi Paolo, would you mind taking a quick look at this patch for
memory.c to consider
it for merge? This resolves an issue with dirty bits not being cleared
as expected.
Here's the Patchwork link: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1240121/
Thanks for your time!
Matt
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 03:19:10AM -0700, Matt Borgerson wrote:
> Currently only the final page offset is being passed to the `log_clear`
> hook via `memory_region_clear_dirty_bitmap` after it is used as an
> iterator in `cpu_physical_memory_test_and_clear_dirty`. This patch
> corrects the start ad
Currently only the final page offset is being passed to the `log_clear`
hook via `memory_region_clear_dirty_bitmap` after it is used as an
iterator in `cpu_physical_memory_test_and_clear_dirty`. This patch
corrects the start address and size of the region.
Signed-off-by: Matt Borgerson
---
exec.
