I'll take this via target-arm.next unless there are any
objections...
thanks
-- PMM
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 14:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Laurent, ping? This patch has been reviewed.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 15:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >
> > In the code for TARGET_NR_clo
Laurent, ping? This patch has been reviewed.
thanks
-- PMM
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 15:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> In the code for TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime, we set the pointer phtx to
> the address of the local variable htx. This means it can never be
> NULL, but later in the code we check it for
On 6/23/23 16:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
In the code for TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime, we set the pointer phtx to
the address of the local variable htx. This means it can never be
NULL, but later in the code we check it for NULL anyway. Coverity
complains about this (CID 1507683) because the NULL chec
On 23/6/23 16:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
In the code for TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime, we set the pointer phtx to
the address of the local variable htx. This means it can never be
NULL, but later in the code we check it for NULL anyway. Coverity
complains about this (CID 1507683) because the NULL chec
In the code for TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime, we set the pointer phtx to
the address of the local variable htx. This means it can never be
NULL, but later in the code we check it for NULL anyway. Coverity
complains about this (CID 1507683) because the NULL check comes after
a call to clock_adjtime() t
