Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Move TARGET_SA_RESTORER out of generic/signal.h

2025-02-12 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
Hi Andreas, On 2025-02-10 13:59:34+0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > SA_RESTORER and the associated sa_restorer field of struct sigaction are > an obsolete feature, not expected to be used by future architectures. > They are also absent on RISC-V, LoongArch, Hexagon and OpenRISC, but > defined due to

Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Move TARGET_SA_RESTORER out of generic/signal.h

2025-02-10 Thread Richard Henderson
On 2/10/25 04:59, Andreas Schwab wrote: SA_RESTORER and the associated sa_restorer field of struct sigaction are an obsolete feature, not expected to be used by future architectures. They are also absent on RISC-V, LoongArch, Hexagon and OpenRISC, but defined due to their use of generic/signal.h.

[PATCH] linux-user: Move TARGET_SA_RESTORER out of generic/signal.h

2025-02-10 Thread Andreas Schwab
SA_RESTORER and the associated sa_restorer field of struct sigaction are an obsolete feature, not expected to be used by future architectures. They are also absent on RISC-V, LoongArch, Hexagon and OpenRISC, but defined due to their use of generic/signal.h. This leads to corrupted data and out-of-