Am 10.12.2021 um 21:14 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> A lot of Optional[] types doesn't make code beautiful.
> test_field_width defaults to 8, but that is never used in the code.
>
> More over, if we want some default behavior for single call of
> test_run(), it should just print
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:15 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <
vsement...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> A lot of Optional[] types doesn't make code beautiful.
> test_field_width defaults to 8, but that is never used in the code.
>
> More over, if we want some default behavior for single call of
> test_r
A lot of Optional[] types doesn't make code beautiful.
test_field_width defaults to 8, but that is never used in the code.
More over, if we want some default behavior for single call of
test_run(), it should just print the whole test name, not limiting or
expanding its width, so 8 is bad default.
