On 9/23/19 5:08 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 15:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/23/19 4:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 11:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>>> wrote:
If the period is too big, the 'delta * period' product result
>>>
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 15:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> On 9/23/19 4:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 11:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> If the period is too big, the 'delta * period' product result
> >> might overflow, resulting in a negative number
On 9/23/19 4:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 11:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
>>
>> If the period is too big, the 'delta * period' product result
>> might overflow, resulting in a negative number, then the
>> next_event ends before the last_event. This is buggy, as ther
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 11:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> If the period is too big, the 'delta * period' product result
> might overflow, resulting in a negative number, then the
> next_event ends before the last_event. This is buggy, as there
> is no forward progress. Assert this can not ha
If the period is too big, the 'delta * period' product result
might overflow, resulting in a negative number, then the
next_event ends before the last_event. This is buggy, as there
is no forward progress. Assert this can not happen.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
hw/core/ptimer.c | 3
