Re: [RESEND PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing #address-cells and #size-cells in the eTSEC node

2021-03-11 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:16:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > From: Bin Meng > > Per devicetree spec v0.3 [1] chapter 2.3.5: > > The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited > from ancestors in the devicetree. They shall be explicitly defined. > If missing, a client program shou

[RESEND PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing #address-cells and #size-cells in the eTSEC node

2021-03-11 Thread Bin Meng
From: Bin Meng Per devicetree spec v0.3 [1] chapter 2.3.5: The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited from ancestors in the devicetree. They shall be explicitly defined. If missing, a client program should assume a default value of 2 for #address-cells, and a value of 1 for

Re: [PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing #address-cells and #size-cells in the eTSEC node

2021-02-18 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:58:39PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > From: Bin Meng > > Per devicetree spec v0.3 [1] chapter 2.3.5: > > The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited > from ancestors in the devicetree. They shall be explicitly defined. > If missing, a client program shou

[PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing #address-cells and #size-cells in the eTSEC node

2021-02-18 Thread Bin Meng
From: Bin Meng Per devicetree spec v0.3 [1] chapter 2.3.5: The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited from ancestors in the devicetree. They shall be explicitly defined. If missing, a client program should assume a default value of 2 for #address-cells, and a value of 1 for