On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:17 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 21:43, Alistair Francis wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:09 AM Bin Meng wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:55 PM Peter Maydell
> > > wrote
> > > > printf is definitely the wrong thing... you need
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 21:43, Alistair Francis wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:09 AM Bin Meng wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:55 PM Peter Maydell
> > wrote
> > > printf is definitely the wrong thing... you need to either report
> > > the error back to the guest if the interface th
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:50 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Ping! This patch was trying to fix a Coverity issue (CID 1435959,
> 1435960, 1435961) -- is anybody planning to review it?
>
> (I'm not entirely sure 'guest error' is the right warning category,
> but I don't know the specifics of this devic
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:09 AM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:55 PM Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 13:33, Bin Meng wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:50 PM Peter Maydell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ping! This patch was trying to fix a Coverity
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:29 AM Green Wan wrote:
>
> Fix code coverage issues by checking return value and handling fail case
> of blk_pread() and blk_pwrite(). Return default value 0xff if read fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Green Wan
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis
Alistair
> ---
> hw/misc/sifive_
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 13:33, Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:50 PM Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> >
> > Ping! This patch was trying to fix a Coverity issue (CID 1435959,
> > 1435960, 1435961) -- is anybody planning to review it?
> >
> > (I'm not entirely sure 'guest error' is the right
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:55 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 13:33, Bin Meng wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:50 PM Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Ping! This patch was trying to fix a Coverity issue (CID 1435959,
> > > 1435960, 1435961) -- is anybody planning to
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:50 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Ping! This patch was trying to fix a Coverity issue (CID 1435959,
> 1435960, 1435961) -- is anybody planning to review it?
>
> (I'm not entirely sure 'guest error' is the right warning category,
> but I don't know the specifics of this devic
Ping! This patch was trying to fix a Coverity issue (CID 1435959,
1435960, 1435961) -- is anybody planning to review it?
(I'm not entirely sure 'guest error' is the right warning category,
but I don't know the specifics of this device.)
thanks
-- PMM
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 09:29, Green Wan wrote
Fix code coverage issues by checking return value and handling fail case
of blk_pread() and blk_pwrite(). Return default value 0xff if read fails.
Signed-off-by: Green Wan
---
hw/misc/sifive_u_otp.c | 31 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --gi
10 matches
Mail list logo