在 2023/8/21 09:29, Jiajie Chen 写道:
>
> On 2023/8/21 09:24, bibo mao wrote:
>> + Add xianglai
>>
>> Good catch.
>>
>> In theory, it is logical id, and it can be not equal to physical id.
>> However it must be equal to _UID in cpu dsdt table which is missing
>> now.
>
> Yes, the logical id can be
在 2023/8/21 09:29, Jiajie Chen 写道:
>
> On 2023/8/21 09:24, bibo mao wrote:
>> + Add xianglai
>>
>> Good catch.
>>
>> In theory, it is logical id, and it can be not equal to physical id.
>> However it must be equal to _UID in cpu dsdt table which is missing
>> now.
>
> Yes, the logical id can b
On 2023/8/21 09:24, bibo mao wrote:
+ Add xianglai
Good catch.
In theory, it is logical id, and it can be not equal to physical id.
However it must be equal to _UID in cpu dsdt table which is missing
now.
Yes, the logical id can be different from index. The spec says:
If the processor struc
+ Add xianglai
Good catch.
In theory, it is logical id, and it can be not equal to physical id.
However it must be equal to _UID in cpu dsdt table which is missing
now.
Can pptt table parse error be fixed if cpu dsdt table is added?
Regards
Bibo Mao
在 2023/8/20 18:56, Jiajie Chen 写道:
> In hw/
In hw/acpi/aml-build.c:build_pptt() function, the code assumes that the
ACPI processor id equals to the cpu index, for example if we have 8
cpus, then the ACPI processor id should be in range 0-7.
However, in hw/loongarch/acpi-build.c:build_madt() function we broke the
assumption. If we have 8 cpu
