Re: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: ICC_PMR_EL1 high bits should be RAZ

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 17:23, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On 14/11/2023 17:14, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 16:54, Ben Dooks wrote: > >> > >> The ICC_PMR_ELx bit msak returned from icc_fullprio_mask > >> should technically also remove any bit above 7 as these > >> are marked reserved

Re: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: ICC_PMR_EL1 high bits should be RAZ

On 14/11/2023 17:14, Peter Maydell wrote: On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 16:54, Ben Dooks wrote: The ICC_PMR_ELx bit msak returned from icc_fullprio_mask should technically also remove any bit above 7 as these are marked reserved (read 0) and should therefore should not be written as anything other th

[PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: ICC_PMR_EL1 high bits should be RAZ

The ICC_PMR_ELx bit msak returned from icc_fullprio_mask should technically also remove any bit above 7 as these are marked reserved (read 0) and should therefore should not be written as anything other than 0. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 inse

Re: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: ICC_PMR_EL1 high bits should be RAZ

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 16:54, Ben Dooks wrote: > > The ICC_PMR_ELx bit msak returned from icc_fullprio_mask > should technically also remove any bit above 7 as these > are marked reserved (read 0) and should therefore should > not be written as anything other than 0. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks