> On May 18, 2022, at 12:31 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 01:08 -0700, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
>> I was setting gpioV4-7 to "1110" using the QOM pin property handler
>> and
>> noticed that lowering gpioV7 was inadvertently lowering gpioV4-6 too.
>>
>> (qemu) qom-set
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 01:08 -0700, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
> I was setting gpioV4-7 to "1110" using the QOM pin property handler
> and
> noticed that lowering gpioV7 was inadvertently lowering gpioV4-6 too.
>
> (qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4 true
> (qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio
> On May 2, 2022, at 8:09 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
> On 5/2/22 10:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
>> I was setting gpioV4-7 to "1110" using the QOM pin property handler and
>> noticed that lowering gpioV7 was inadvertently lowering gpioV4-6 too.
>> (qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4 true
On 5/2/22 10:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
I was setting gpioV4-7 to "1110" using the QOM pin property handler and
noticed that lowering gpioV7 was inadvertently lowering gpioV4-6 too.
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4 true
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV5 true
(qemu) q
I was setting gpioV4-7 to "1110" using the QOM pin property handler and
noticed that lowering gpioV7 was inadvertently lowering gpioV4-6 too.
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV4 true
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV5 true
(qemu) qom-set /machine/soc/gpio gpioV6 true
(qemu
