In bcm2835_fb_mbox_push(), Coverity complains (CID 1429989) that we
pass a pointer to a local struct to another function without
initializing all its fields. This is a real bug:
bcm2835_fb_reconfigure() copies the whole of our new BCM2385FBConfig
struct into s->config, so any fields we don't initi
On 6/28/20 9:54 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In bcm2835_fb_mbox_push(), Coverity complains (CID 1429989) that we
> pass a pointer to a local struct to another function without
> initializing all its fields. This is a real bug:
> bcm2835_fb_reconfigure() copies the whole of our new BCM2385FBConfig
>
In bcm2835_fb_mbox_push(), Coverity complains (CID 1429989) that we
pass a pointer to a local struct to another function without
initializing all its fields. This is a real bug:
bcm2835_fb_reconfigure() copies the whole of our new BCM2385FBConfig
struct into s->config, so any fields we don't initi