On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 4:27 AM Andrew Melnichenko wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
> In the future, there would be eBPF RSS + the helper for Libvirt interaction.
> And those patches are required for future work. Technically they are
> required for the current builds with linked libbpf 1.01.
> Can we apply thi
Hi, all.
In the future, there would be eBPF RSS + the helper for Libvirt interaction.
And those patches are required for future work. Technically they are
required for the current builds with linked libbpf 1.01.
Can we apply this patch?
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 6:19 PM Andrew Melnichenko wrote:
>
Hi, it's a good idea to update the skeleton generation. Technically
skeleton generation is not a part of Qemu building. The skeleton is
already presented in the Qemu tree, so we skip dependencies from
clang/bpftool.
It's a good idea to have an updated bpf program and simplified
Makefile with Qemu s
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 05:15:04PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/12/22 15:39, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > The current implementation fails to load on a system with
> > libbpf 1.0 and reports that legacy map definitions in 'maps'
> > section are not supported by libbpf v1.0+. Thi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:32:47PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:49:37PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 07:14:54PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:56:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:49:37PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 07:14:54PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:56:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:09:27PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 07:14:54PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:56:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:09:27PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > > The current implementation fails to load on a system with
> > > libbpf 1.0 an
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:56:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:09:27PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > The current implementation fails to load on a system with
> > libbpf 1.0 and reports that legacy map definitions in 'maps'
> > section are not support
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:09:27PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> The current implementation fails to load on a system with
> libbpf 1.0 and reports that legacy map definitions in 'maps'
> section are not supported by libbpf v1.0+. This commit updates
> the Makefile to add BTF (-g flag) and appropri
Hi,
On 18/12/22 15:39, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
The current implementation fails to load on a system with
libbpf 1.0 and reports that legacy map definitions in 'maps'
section are not supported by libbpf v1.0+. This commit updates
the Makefile to add BTF (-g flag) and appropriately updates
the maps i
The current implementation fails to load on a system with
libbpf 1.0 and reports that legacy map definitions in 'maps'
section are not supported by libbpf v1.0+. This commit updates
the Makefile to add BTF (-g flag) and appropriately updates
the maps in rss.bpf.c and update the skeleton file in rep
11 matches
Mail list logo
