On 1/21/21 4:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:12:41PM -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The ordering semantics of +feature/-feature is tricky and not
obvious, and it requires a custom option parser. Deprecate that
syntax so we can eventually remove the custom -cpu option
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:12:41 -0500
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The ordering semantics of +feature/-feature is tricky and not
> obvious, and it requires a custom option parser. Deprecate that
> syntax so we can eventually remove the custom -cpu option parser
> and plus_features/minus_features global
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:12:41PM -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The ordering semantics of +feature/-feature is tricky and not
> obvious, and it requires a custom option parser. Deprecate that
> syntax so we can eventually remove the custom -cpu option parser
> and plus_features/minus_features g
On Wednesday, 2021-01-20 at 15:12:41 -05, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The ordering semantics of +feature/-feature is tricky and not
> obvious, and it requires a custom option parser. Deprecate that
> syntax so we can eventually remove the custom -cpu option parser
> and plus_features/minus_features
The ordering semantics of +feature/-feature is tricky and not
obvious, and it requires a custom option parser. Deprecate that
syntax so we can eventually remove the custom -cpu option parser
and plus_features/minus_features global variables in i386.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
---
docs/syste
