On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The HAXM project has been retired (see https://github.com/intel/haxm#status),
> so we should mark the code in QEMU as deprecated (and finally remove it
> unless somebody else picks the project up again - which is quite unlikely
> since
On 25/01/2023 13.09, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
The HAXM project has been retired (see https://github.com/intel/haxm#status),
so we should mark the code in QEMU as deprecated (and finally remove it
unless somebody else picks the project
On 25/1/23 11:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
The HAXM project has been retired (see https://github.com/intel/haxm#status),
so we should mark the code in QEMU as deprecated (and finally remove it
unless somebody else picks the project up again - which is quite unlikely
since there are now whpx and hvf on
The HAXM project has been retired (see https://github.com/intel/haxm#status),
so we should mark the code in QEMU as deprecated (and finally remove it
unless somebody else picks the project up again - which is quite unlikely
since there are now whpx and hvf on these operating systems, too).
Signed-
