Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 5. 3. 2020 16:27, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> Juan Quintela writes:
>>>
There were one error on the test (missing an s for --exists).
But we really need a recent zstd (0.8.1).
That version was released in 2016, so it is newer that so
On 5. 3. 2020 16:27, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Juan Quintela writes:
>>
>>> There were one error on the test (missing an s for --exists).
>>> But we really need a recent zstd (0.8.1).
>>> That version was released in 2016, so it is newer that some of our travis
>>> images. Jus
Juan Quintela writes:
> Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Juan Quintela writes:
>>
>>> There were one error on the test (missing an s for --exists).
>>> But we really need a recent zstd (0.8.1).
>>> That version was released in 2016, so it is newer that some of our travis
>>> images. Just check for the
Alex Bennée wrote:
> Juan Quintela writes:
>
>> There were one error on the test (missing an s for --exists).
>> But we really need a recent zstd (0.8.1).
>> That version was released in 2016, so it is newer that some of our travis
>> images. Just check for the version that we need.
>>
>> Signed
Juan Quintela writes:
> There were one error on the test (missing an s for --exists).
> But we really need a recent zstd (0.8.1).
> That version was released in 2016, so it is newer that some of our travis
> images. Just check for the version that we need.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> R
There were one error on the test (missing an s for --exists).
But we really need a recent zstd (0.8.1).
That version was released in 2016, so it is newer that some of our travis
images. Just check for the version that we need.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Reported-by: Richard Henderson
---
con
