Peter Maydell wrote:
> The const_le64() macro introduced in commit 845d80a8c7b187 turns out
> to have a bug which means that on big-endian systems the compiler
> complains if the argument isn't already a 64-bit type. This hasn't
> caused a problem yet, because there are no in-tree uses, but it
> me
Am 22.01.2024 um 18:37 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> The const_le64() macro introduced in commit 845d80a8c7b187 turns out
> to have a bug which means that on big-endian systems the compiler
> complains if the argument isn't already a 64-bit type. This hasn't
> caused a problem yet, because there
On 22/01/2024 18.37, Peter Maydell wrote:
The const_le64() macro introduced in commit 845d80a8c7b187 turns out
to have a bug which means that on big-endian systems the compiler
complains if the argument isn't already a 64-bit type. This hasn't
caused a problem yet, because there are no in-tree us
On 22/1/24 18:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
The const_le64() macro introduced in commit 845d80a8c7b187 turns out
to have a bug which means that on big-endian systems the compiler
complains if the argument isn't already a 64-bit type. This hasn't
caused a problem yet, because there are no in-tree uses,
The const_le64() macro introduced in commit 845d80a8c7b187 turns out
to have a bug which means that on big-endian systems the compiler
complains if the argument isn't already a 64-bit type. This hasn't
caused a problem yet, because there are no in-tree uses, but it
means it's not possible for anybo
