On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 05:22:29PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> First, this permission never protected node from being changed, as
a node
> generic child-replacing functions don't check it.
>
> Second, it's a strange thing: it presents a permission of parent node
> to change its
Forget to mention in subject: for-6.2
20.07.2021 17:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
First, this permission never protected node from being changed, as
generic child-replacing functions don't check it.
Second, it's a strange thing: it presents a permission of parent node
to change its ch
First, this permission never protected node from being changed, as
generic child-replacing functions don't check it.
Second, it's a strange thing: it presents a permission of parent node
to change its child. But generally, children are replaced by different
mechanisms, like jobs or qmp commands, n
