Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:55:08PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Xu writes:
>>
>> > It's not obvious to many that RDMA migration is in Odd Fixes stage for a
>> > long time. Add an explicit sub entry for it (besides migration, which
>> > already covers the rdma files
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:55:08PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > It's not obvious to many that RDMA migration is in Odd Fixes stage for a
> > long time. Add an explicit sub entry for it (besides migration, which
> > already covers the rdma files) to be clear on that, m
On 25/09/2023 21:34, Peter Xu wrote:
> It's not obvious to many that RDMA migration is in Odd Fixes stage for a
> long time. Add an explicit sub entry for it (besides migration, which
> already covers the rdma files) to be clear on that, meanwhile add Zhijian
> as Reviewer, so Zhijian can see th
Peter Xu writes:
> It's not obvious to many that RDMA migration is in Odd Fixes stage for a
> long time. Add an explicit sub entry for it (besides migration, which
> already covers the rdma files) to be clear on that, meanwhile add Zhijian
> as Reviewer, so Zhijian can see the patches and review
It's not obvious to many that RDMA migration is in Odd Fixes stage for a
long time. Add an explicit sub entry for it (besides migration, which
already covers the rdma files) to be clear on that, meanwhile add Zhijian
as Reviewer, so Zhijian can see the patches and review when he still has
the band
