Re: [OpenBIOS] [Qemu-devel] Re: What is the current support state for Sparc emulation

2007-07-22 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070720 15:11]: > > Unaligned accesses should be done with unaligned-l@ ( addr -- quad ) > > instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > So either the pointer was calculated wrong or Solaris does not care > > about alignment in l@ > > > > If you change it, please make the

Re: [OpenBIOS] [Qemu-devel] Re: What is the current support state for Sparc emulation

2007-07-20 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070719 20:46]: > On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unhandled Exception 0x0007 > > PC = 0xffd0a55c NPC = 0xffd09374 > > Stopping execution > > > > So this is my report, I hope it can be of some use. I'll try to boot sparc > > ve

Re: [OpenBIOS] [Qemu-devel] Re: What is the current support state for Sparc emulation

2007-07-20 Thread Blue Swirl
> Maybe write_long should handle unaligned addresses? Possibly. But something is wrong. Unaligned accesses should be done with unaligned-l@ ( addr -- quad ) instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] So either the pointer was calculated wrong or Solaris does not care about alignment in l@ If you change it,