On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 16:35 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > >> OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional (ie future...)
> > > >> features in PowerPC 64 emulation.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe worth letting the target say whether it needs 32 or 64-bit
> > > > flags.
> > > > The flag lookup is l
> > >> OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional (ie future...)
> > >> features in PowerPC 64 emulation.
> > >
> > > Maybe worth letting the target say whether it needs 32 or 64-bit
> > > flags.
> > > The flag lookup is likely to be on a hot path.
> > >
>
> I may be wrong, but it seems
On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:56 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On Sep 19, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Ok, I will try to shift the intercepts in an uint_64 flags
variable
in the TB.
OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:56 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
>
> Ok, I will try to shift the intercepts in an uint_64 flags variable
> in the TB.
> >>
> >> OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional (ie future...)
> >> features in
flags64.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sep 19, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Ok, I will try to shift the intercepts in an uint_64 flags variable
in the TB.
OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional (ie future...)
features in PowerPC 64 emulation.
Maybe worth letting
On Sep 19, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Ok, I will try to shift the intercepts in an uint_64 flags variable
in the TB.
OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional (ie future...)
features in PowerPC 64 emulation.
Maybe worth letting the target say whether it needs 32 or 64-
> > > Ok, I will try to shift the intercepts in an uint_64 flags variable
> > > in the TB.
>
> OK, great. Having 64 bits may also help for additional (ie future...)
> features in PowerPC 64 emulation.
Maybe worth letting the target say whether it needs 32 or 64-bit flags.
The flag lookup is likely
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 22:54 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> Forwarded, as requested.
>
> Forwarded Message
> > From: Alexander Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: J.Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SVM support
> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:51:26 +0200
> >
>
Forwarded, as requested.
Forwarded Message
> From: Alexander Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: J.Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SVM support
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:51:26 +0200
>
> On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:09 PM, J. Mayer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-0
