[Bug 1500265] Re: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr

2021-05-04 Thread Thomas Huth
This is an automated cleanup. This bug report has been moved to QEMU's new bug tracker on gitlab.com and thus gets marked as 'expired' now. Please continue with the discussion here: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/117 ** Changed in: qemu Status: Triaged => Expired ** Bug w

[Bug 1500265] Re: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr

2020-08-08 Thread Thomas Huth
** Changed in: qemu Status: Incomplete => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500265 Title: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr Status in QEMU: Triage

[Bug 1500265] Re: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr

2020-08-07 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
The status of this issue is unchanged in QEMU, i.e. user.virtfs.* is still filtered out. If someone wants to see this changed, please use the common way for sending the patch via ML: https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1500265] Re: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr

2020-08-07 Thread Thomas Huth
Looking through old bug tickets... is this still an issue with the latest version of QEMU? Or could we close this ticket nowadays? ** Changed in: qemu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. h

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1500265] Re: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr

2018-08-07 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Interesting approach. But maybe it should be configurable (eg. specify the mapping prefix). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500265 Title: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=map

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1500265] Re: nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr

2015-09-27 Thread Daniel Haid
After looking at the code, it seems that disabling the user.virtfs namespace was the intended behaviour. I have created a patch implementing nesting instead of disabling. I do not know if this is the right way to do it, but I did some limited testing and it seemed ok. ** Patch added: "nested-virt