On 03/18/2011 03:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 March 2011 23:31, walt wrote:
The following commit has a strange side-effect on gcc-4.5.2:
The new code in 'target-i386/translate.c' compiles just fine with gcc-4.4.4,
using less than 1GB of RAM, but gcc-4.5.2 uses the whole GB and
Hi qemu team,
The following commit has a strange side-effect on gcc-4.5.2:
commit c832e3de64f1069313fc0672087791cc3dd5b4d8
Author: Richard Henderson
Date: Mon Jan 10 19:23:47 2011 -0800
target-i386: Use deposit operation.
Use this for assignment to the low byte or low word of a r
On 08/25/2010 04:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 06:09 PM, walt wrote:
On 08/25/2010 12:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote:
I find that qemu-kvm boots to the Win7 login prompt in 25 seconds,
while qemu with kvm enabled takes about 45 seconds
On 08/25/2010 12:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote:
Hi qemu team,
I just discovered that qemu now offers kvm support, so I decided to
compare it to qemu-kvm.
I'm running the latest git versions of both programs on an AMD64
host running the latest kernel
Hi qemu team,
I just discovered that qemu now offers kvm support, so I decided to
compare it to qemu-kvm.
I'm running the latest git versions of both programs on an AMD64
host running the latest kernel from Linus.git.
The guest is Windows 7 on a qcow2 disk image and one kvm64 cpu.
Using the sa
