Hi David,
Do you have any comment on this patch? :-)
Cc qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
On 2020/2/10 18:44, Xiao Yang wrote:
> From: Xiao Yang
>
> Also add a hint that user should start 'ireg' daemon before using shared
> cache.
>
> Signed-off-b
All code in fuse.h and struct fuse_module are not used by virtiofsd
so removing them is safe.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang
---
tools/virtiofsd/fuse.h | 1229 --
tools/virtiofsd/fuse_i.h | 16 -
2 files changed, 1245 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools
tch for the detailed info:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-January/msg00117.html
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
On 2020/1/21 18:51, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Xiao Yang (yangx...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
On 2019/12/13 0:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
- res = fuse_buf_copy(&pipe_buf, buf,
- FUSE_BUF_FORCE_SPLICE | FUSE_BUF_SPLICE_NONBLOCK);
- if (res&
removed all pipes used by fuse_buf_copy().
Is it necessary to leave the code related to splice(2)? Is it going to
be used in future?
We have to use splice(2) by the correct CONFIG_SPLICE macro If necessary.
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
f_inode(lo, newinode, 1);
+pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
Hi,
It seems to avoid calling pthread_mutex_lock and pthread_mutex_unlock twice.
Does the change fix some issues or improve the performance?
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
lo_inode_put(lo,&oldinode);
lo_inode_put(lo
void *opaque)
elem = NULL;
}
}
+out:
pthread_mutex_destroy(&ch.lock);
free(fbuf.mem);
Hi,
Tested the patch and got the correct data written by guest, so it looks
fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
