Pranith,
Thanks for doing this. I totally forgot about this (my work has moved
elsewhere) so thank you for picking it back up.
Please don’t worry about the attribution.
The patch LGTM. :)
Cheers,
Allan
On 2/3/17, 10:55 AM, "Pranith Kumar" wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
> On
Note that x86_64 has only _rt signal handlers. This implementation
attempts to share code with the x86_32 implementation.
Reported-by: Timothy Pearson
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell
Signed-off-by: Allan Wirth
---
linux-user/signal.c | 344 ---
targ
Laurent,
Seems to work well for my specific case – select no longer returns EFAULT on
x86_64 linux user mode, and the arguments are passed correctly.
Thank you!
Cheers,
Allan
On 7/7/16, 7:17 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>TARGET_NR_select can have three different implementations:
>
> 1- to al
On 7/7/16, 3:09 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>
>
>Le 07/07/2016 à 21:04, Wirth, Allan a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 7/7/16, 3:02 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 07/07/2016 à 20:49, Riku Voipio a écrit
On 7/7/16, 3:02 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>
>
>Le 07/07/2016 à 20:49, Riku Voipio a écrit :
>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:12:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Sadly, this can't work:
sparc/sparc64/cris use sys_select for NR_sel
introduce new emulation bugs.
Cheers,
Allan Wirth
On 7/1/16, 9:35 AM, "Peter Maydell" wrote:
>On 1 July 2016 at 12:59, Wirth, Allan wrote:
>> Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
>> passed directly. This patch switches a define s
Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
passed directly. This patch switches a define so X86_64 uses the correct
calling convention.
Signed-off-by: Allan Wirth
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/s