ictor
From: Khem Raj
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 1:53 PM
To: Victor Kamensky (kamensky)
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé; Richard Purdie; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Aleksandar
Rikalo; Aleksandar Markovic; Aurelien Jarno; Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] target/mips: Mak
ttps://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/downloads-mips/documents/MD00419-2B-34Kf-DTS-01.20.pdf
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé on behalf of
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 7:53 AM
To: Richard Purdie; Victor Kamensky (kamensky); qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Aleksandar Rikalo; Khem
Hi Richard,
Please forgive my cumbersome mailing agent at work.
Please look inline for 'victor>'
From: Richard Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 7:22 PM
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Victor Kamensky (kamensky)
C
ks,
Victor
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé on behalf of
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 6:25 AM
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Victor Kamensky (kamensky)
Cc: Khem Raj; Richard Henderson; Aleksandar Rikalo; Aleksandar Markovic; Jiaxun
Yang; Aurelien Jarn
wild but given performance gains it seems to be justified.
Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky
---
target/mips/translate_init.c.inc | 55
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/mips/translate_init.c.inc b/target/mips/translate_init.c.inc
index 637caccd89
-models-for-mips-hosts
[2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13992
[3] https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/143099
Victor Kamensky (1):
mips: add 34Kf-64tlb fictitious cpu type like 34Kf but with 64 TLBs
target/mips/translate_init.c.inc | 55
nce
processing pending CPU state updates, including pending
interrupts.
This change brings consistency with how DISAS_UPDATE is treated
in aarch32 case.
CC: Peter Maydell
CC: Alex Bennée
CC: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell
Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky
Reviewed-by: Richard Hender
On 23 January 2014 18:14, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:50:18PM -0800, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> On 23 January 2014 12:45, Christoffer Dall
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:25:35AM -0800, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> >> On 23 Janu
On 23 January 2014 12:45, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:25:35AM -0800, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> On 23 January 2014 07:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > On 23 January 2014 15:06, Victor Kamensky
>> > wrote:
>> >> In [1] I wrote
>>
On 23 January 2014 08:25, Victor Kamensky wrote:
> On 23 January 2014 07:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 23 January 2014 15:06, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>>> In [1] I wrote
>>>
>>> "I don't see why you so attached to desire to describe
>>
On 23 January 2014 07:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 January 2014 15:06, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> In [1] I wrote
>>
>> "I don't see why you so attached to desire to describe
>> data part of memory transaction as just one of int
>> types. If we are t
On 23 January 2014 02:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 January 2014 00:22, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> Peter, could I please ask you a favor. Could you please
>> stop deleting pieces of your and my previous responses
>> when you reply.
>
> No, sorry. It produces e
Hi Alex,
Sorry, for delayed reply, I was focusing on discussion
with Peter. Hope you and other folks may get something
out of it :).
Please see responses inline
On 22 January 2014 02:52, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 22.01.2014, at 08:26, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>
>> On 21 Jan
will make your response email bigger, but I am very
confused otherwise.
On 22 January 2014 15:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 January 2014 22:47, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> You deleted my example, but I need it again:
>> Consider the following ARM code snippets:
>>
&
On 22 January 2014 12:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 January 2014 19:29, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> On 22 January 2014 09:29, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> This just isn't how real buses work. There is no
>>> "address + 1, address + 2". There is a single ad
On 22 January 2014 09:29, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 January 2014 17:19, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> On 22 January 2014 02:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> but the major issue here is that the data being
>>> transferred is not just a bag of bytes. The data[]
>>>
Hi Peter,
On 22 January 2014 02:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 January 2014 05:39, Victor Kamensky wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Christoffer and I had a bit heated chat :) on this
>> subject last night. Christoffer, really appreciate
>> your time! We did not rea
Hi Guys,
Christoffer and I had a bit heated chat :) on this
subject last night. Christoffer, really appreciate
your time! We did not really reach agreement
during the chat and Christoffer asked me to follow
up on this thread.
Here it goes. Sorry, it is very long email.
I don't believe we can assi
On 21 January 2014 22:41, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 22.01.2014 um 07:31 schrieb Anup Patel :
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Victor Kamensky
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> Christoffer and I had a bit heated chat :) on th
19 matches
Mail list logo
