On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/08/2012 10:13, Ruben Kerkhof ha scritto:
>>> > That's correct. Live block migration will use two ports, both served by
>>> > the destination, one using NBD and one for RAM/device migration data
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> That's correct. Live block migration will use two ports, both served by
> the destination, one using NBD and one for RAM/device migration data.
> It will be a little more complicated than just migrate -b, but nothing
> that libvirt cannot or
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your explanation.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
> I think when classic block migration is removed for good it should be
> just as easy to use through libvirt using TCP because that's still a
> valid use case and probably the simplest one to get sta
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> To be replaced with live block copy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
>> ---
>> migration.c |9 +
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>
