KAWAKATSU Noritaka writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> I have built u-boot binary for 'qemu-system-mips -M mips'.
> It is fine to run ths u-boot binary.
> But the same u-boot binary does not run on 'qemu-system-mips64 -M mips'.
>
> I do not understand what happends on the qemu-mips64 execution.
> Is this a b
The usb-msd device emulation needs some small tweaks in the requests
emulations. For instance, the reset/maxlun requests are class/interface
specific so requests for them with the type class and recipient interface
bits sets have to be handled.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard
---
diff --git a/hw/us
pinery writes:
Hi,
> 於 四，2010-02-04 於 22:56 +0530，Utkarsh Sopan 提到：
>>
>> Can you tell me what is the status of adding MIPS64 support?
>> as at the wiki page it showed Red earlier.
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Utkars
"Kirill A. Shutemov" writes:
Hi,
> -fstack-protector-all emit extra code to check for buffer overflows,
> such as stack smashing attacks. This is done by adding a guard
> variable to functions with vulnerable objects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov
> ---
> configure |1 +
> 1 files
"Kirill A. Shutemov" writes:
Hi,
> CCi386-linux-user/mmap.o
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/linux-user/mmap.c: In function 'mmap_frag':
> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/linux-user/mmap.c:253: error: ignoring return
> value of 'pread', declared wi
Riku Voipio writes:
Hi,
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:25:36PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> Note that I have some reservations about the current init_paths() and
>> path() code:
>> - their names seem to confusing. Maybe those should be init_base() and
>> base() or something similar;
>> - why does i
