On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 12:13 AM, Rob Earhart wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Avi Kivity > <mailto:a...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> The kvm api has been accumulating cruft for several years now.
>>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The kvm api has been accumulating cruft for several years now. This is
> due to feature creep, fixing mistakes, experience gained by the
> maintainers and developers on how to do things, ports to new
> architectures, and simply as a side effect
(Resending as plain text to appease vger.kernel.org :-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> The kvm api has been accumulating cruft for several years now. This is
> due to feature creep, fixing mistakes, experience gained by the
> maintainers and developers on how to do things,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 07:13 PM, Rob Earhart wrote:
>
>> Modify the snapshot load path to find and load snapshots contained in
>> backing
>> disks, useful when the current disk is a differencing disk.
>>
>> Add t
snapshots from backing disks (which doesn't seem like a
problem), and for code which parses the snapshot list output (if any).
Signed-off-by: Rob Earhart
---
block.c| 10 +
block.h|2 +
block/qcow2-snapshot.c |
So, I have a patch I'd like to submit. It's pretty simple - when using a
differencing disk and loading a snapshot, it includes the backing disks in
the search. It seems to work fine on my machine.
I'm not sure what the procedure for submitting changes is; it's been a long
time since I've contrib
