On 08.01.19 11:23, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Suggested-by: Michael Hanselmann
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Michael Hanselmann
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Paolo
On 28.12.18 14:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 27/12/18 12:51, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
>> The "eeprom_write_data" function in "smbus_eeprom.c" had no provisions
>> to limit the length of data written. If a caller were able to manipulate
>> the &qu
Hi Philippe
On 27.12.18 20:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:53 PM Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> > The "eeprom_write_data" function in "smbus_eeprom.c" had no provisions
> > to limit the length of data written. If a caller w
The "eeprom_write_data" function in "smbus_eeprom.c" had no provisions
to limit the length of data written. If a caller were able to manipulate
the "len" parameter they could potentially write before or after the
target buffer.
---
hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
e the opportunity to not assign the filename member twice.
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann
---
hw/usb/dev-mtp.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/usb/dev-mtp.c b/hw/usb/dev-mtp.c
index 100b7171f4..360ca65ee4 100644
--- a/hw/usb/dev-mtp.c
+++ b/hw/usb/dev-
ct of this bug is rather low when qemu is managed by
> libvirt due to qemu running sandboxed, so there isn't much you can gain
> access to that way.
>
> Fixes: CVE-2018-pjp-please-get-one
> Cc: Prasad J Pandit
> Cc: Bandan Das
> Reported-by: Michael Hanselmann
> Sig
On 06.12.18 09:48, P J P wrote:
> While performing block transfer write in smb_ioport_writeb(),
> 'smb_index' is incremented and used to index smb_data[] array.
> Check 'smb_index' value to avoid OOB access.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Hanselmann
Considering that
On 06.12.18 09:48, P J P wrote:
> Reported-by: Michael Hanselmann
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit
Reviewed-by: Michael Hanselmann
Best regards,
Michael
>>>> Note this also stops the classic escape via "../".
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: CVE-2018-16867
>>>> Reported-by: Michael Hanselmann (hansmi.ch)
>>>
>>> It's common for scripts to match '', can you write this one as
&
Hi Avi
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 03:17:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> --- bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl 28 Sep 2006 18:56:20 - 1.1
>> +++ bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl 30 Oct 2007 23:52:22 -
>> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ DefinitionBlock (
>> Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
>>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:42:22AM +0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> The patch below updates the i440FX/PIIX3 emulation. It does:
I never got any reaction to that patch. Is it still awaiting review?
> This does not yet remove the workaround introduced by Igor Lvovsky's
> patch
the specs
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This does not yet remove the workaround introduced by Igor Lvovsky's
patch. However, I'm working on that since it, despite my earlier mail,
seems to help with my ACPI shutdown problem.
Greets,
Michael
Inde
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:52:30AM -0700, Igor Lvovsky wrote:
> My last patch can be temporary workaround and now we can get the ACPI
> interrupts without disrupt anything else, but I'll try to find full
> solution for this issue.
Interestingly, Linux doesn't receive any interrupts from ACPI, to
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0700, n schembr wrote:
> Is system_powerdown a better way to stop the host? Is
> system_powerdown a soft operation like the atx powersupply? It did
> not work with a smoothwall guest.
It would, but is not implemented for x86. I've been working on it using
ACP
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:32:23PM +0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> The patch below implements ACPI_ENABLE and ACPI_DISABLE as described in
> section 4.7.2.5 of the ACPI 3.0 specs.
Has this patch been ignored by accident or is there something wrong with
it?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Hello
I'm trying to implement the “system_powerdown” command for i386/x86_64.
After way too much time, I've now to hope for someone else being able to
help me, I just don't get it anymore. Due to the available
infrastructure, I decided to use an ACPI power button event. You can
find my current pat
The patch below implements ACPI_ENABLE and ACPI_DISABLE as described in
section 4.7.2.5 of the ACPI 3.0 specs.
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greets,
Michael
---
Index: hw/acpi.c
===
RCS file: /source
Hello
The patch below implements ^W (Ctrl+W) in readline.c, allowing it to be
used in the monitor.
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greets,
Michael
---
Index: readline.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qem
18 matches
Mail list logo
