On Tuesday 05 April 2016 22:50:51 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:14:01AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 04/05/2016 03:24 AM, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> >
> > >> +requested.
> > >> +
> > >> +Th
On Tuesday 05 April 2016 15:50:16 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 05/04/2016 11:24, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > Also it is uncertain if these status bits may change over time through
> > reorganization of backend storage, for example holes may be removed in
> > the backend
Hi,
On Monday 04 April 2016 16:15:43 Eric Blake wrote:
> qemu already has an existing server implementation option that will
> explicitly search the payload of NBD_CMD_WRITE for large blocks of
> zeroes, and punch holes in the underlying file. For old clients
> that don't know how to use the new
Hi,
On Monday 04 April 2016 10:39:10 Eric Blake wrote:
> With the availability of sparse storage formats, it is often needed
> to query status of a particular range and read only those blocks of
> data that are actually present on the block device.
>
> To provide such information, the patch adds
Hi,
On Monday 28 March 2016 09:58:52 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/25/2016 02:49 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >> You may also want to add a rule that for all future extensions, any
> >> command that requires data in the server response (other than the server
> >> response to NBD_CMD_READ) must incl
Hi,
back from my easter vacation. A bit surprised to find 200 mails in the
NBD mailing list ;).
On Friday 25 March 2016 09:49:29 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 04:08:13PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 03/23/2016 08:16 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > > From: Pavel Borzenkov
> >
