Re: [Qemu-devel] Missing ARMv6 instructions?

2006-03-29 Thread John Hogerhuis
So it's a purely contractual issue as opposed to an IP issue.Is a party to this contract allowed to write a disassembler? I can imagine a very nice disassembler feature that would explain in detail how each instruction it decodes works... Of course no matter how such documentation were to escape, y

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU/KQEMU for server consolidation?

2005-11-08 Thread John Hogerhuis
On 11/8/05, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anybody on this list have a (working) serial tablet? I'd like to knowthe activating response, so I can finally finish up the rfb patch. Earlier I noticed a couple wacom serial units on ebay around $50 US. I can pitch in $30 to help b

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KQEmu (KDE GUI For QEMU) 0.2 pre-alpha is OUT

2005-11-03 Thread John Hogerhuis
On 11/3/05, Jim C. Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: KQEMU the GUI was first, kqemu the accelerator stole the name.Well, according to the QEMU website, QEMU is a trademark of Fabrice Bellard. To use QEMU in a product name would require permission from Fabrice to be on solid ground, morally and lega

Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu 0.7.2 on Windows - Serial port communication

2005-11-01 Thread John Hogerhuis
On 11/1/05, Glenn Gagné <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I installed Qemu 0.7.2 on Windows 2000 Pro and I run a Windows 95 in the virtual environement of Qemu. I have an oldMS-DOS application to use who communicate on serial port... But it's not working in the virtual environement. Qemu is able to transl

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support

2005-05-19 Thread John Hogerhuis
On 5/19/05, Thomas Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It as also because C avoids the n by m problem. > My point is that you can have your cake and eat it too. For any given architecture gcc can generate the first approximation by way of dyngen or dyngen + gcc enhancements. But once you are

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp 64-bit fixes

2005-05-19 Thread John Hogerhuis
On 5/18/05, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found a number of security holes in slirp before, and tried to notify > them. I found the package isn't being maintained anymore. > I contacted the current maintainer, and he said the package needs a new maintainer. I advised him to make a note of

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support

2005-05-18 Thread John Hogerhuis
This all feels wrong in general. The changes should either be adding some facility to gcc which permits QEMU to use it in this way (gcc is an open source project after all, so it's at least a possibility), or we should generate the dynamic code generator once with whatever version of GCC and make t

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp 64-bit fixes

2005-05-18 Thread John Hogerhuis
Curious if the patches to slirp are being forwarded upstream to the current slirp maintainer. I wonder if he even knows QEMU uses it? http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slirp-devel -- John. ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org h