[Qemu-devel] [Bug 595906] Re: [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX, SUBADDX give incorrect results

2010-06-19 Thread Chris Winter
Chih-Min, I think this fix looks good. Can you submit it to qemu-devel so someone can push it to mainline? -- [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX,SUBADDX give incorrect results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which i

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 595906] Re: [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX, SUBADDX give incorrect results

2010-06-19 Thread Chris Winter
** Changed in: qemu Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: qemu Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX,SUBADDX give incorrect results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, wh

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 595906] Re: [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX, SUBADDX give incorrect results

2010-06-18 Thread Chris Winter
I tested Chih-Min's patch with my local git clone, and I can verify that it appears to fix the issue. -- [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX,SUBADDX give incorrect results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subs

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 595906] Re: [ARM] All variants of ADDSUBX, SUBADDX give incorrect results

2010-06-18 Thread Chris Winter
I have been able to reproduce this issue using the attached C file on a custom arm1136-based qemu device, with latest git HEAD as of about 15 minutes ago. Running my test program on real hardware -- an arm1176-based board, and a cortex-a8-based board -- produces the desired result (0x78001800). I'