Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7] linux-user: Fix llseek with high bit of offset_low set

2016-08-15 Thread Chanho Park
It works perfectly. Thanks. Tested-by: Chanho Park On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > The llseek syscall takes two 32-bit arguments, offset_high > and offset_low, which must be combined to form a single > 64-bit offset. Unfortunately we were combining

[Qemu-devel] lseek beyond 2GB offset for qemu-arm user

2016-08-11 Thread Chanho Park
ror("error"); exit(1); } write(fd, "TEST", 4); close(fd); close(fd); return 0; } -- Best Regards, Chanho Park

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Correct type for LOOP_GET_STATUS{, 64} ioctls

2016-07-06 Thread Chanho Park
_info64 structure definition was also missing a member > and using the wrong type for several 32-bit fields. > > In particular, this meant that "kpartx -d image.img" didn't work > and "losetup -a" behaved strangely. Correct the ioctl type definitions. > > Reported-b

Re: [Qemu-devel] failed kpartx on qemu-aarch64-static

2016-07-04 Thread Chanho Park
Hi Peter, On Tuesday, July 5, 2016, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 2 July 2016 at 19:23, Peter Maydell > wrote: > > On 2 July 2016 at 17:25, Chanho Park > > wrote: > >> I've got a kpartx crash frin qemu-aarch64 user emulation. > >> The version of qem

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] linux-user: fix kpartx ioctl problems

2016-07-04 Thread Chanho Park
sertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 > > I've verified it's fixed and kpartx is working well. Tested-by: Chanho Park -- Best Regards, Chanho Park

[Qemu-devel] failed kpartx on qemu-aarch64-static

2016-07-02 Thread Chanho Park
lib64/libattr.so.1.1.0 004000dae000-004000db2000 rw-p 00:00 0 qemu: uncaught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped -- Best Regards, Chanho Park